City Council · 2026-06-25 11:27 AM
Amend Item
Majority required - CC42.2 - Chow - motion 1
- Motion result
- Carried
- Recorded tally
- 23-1
- Source outcome
- Carried, 23-1
Toronto council record
Motion-level votes, outcomes, decision bodies, official item details, and ways to participate—connected to the current elected-official record, not to any candidate campaign.
896
Agenda items with votes
0
Listed committees
150
Pages of sourced history
Council accountability
Page 10 of 150
Toronto council records are cached and may be delayed while updates load. A missing record does not establish how an official voted.
The purpose of this report is to advise that the City Manager will be submitting a supplementary report that provides a response to Council directive 2026.CC.38.1 to provide an update on the negotiations between the City and Province on executing a memorandum of understanding for uploading the Garinder Expressway and Don Valley Parkway.
City Council · 2026-06-25 11:27 AM
Majority required - CC42.2 - Chow - motion 1
On June 23, 2026, the Premier of Ontario announced that $1.5 billion in funding will be provided to the City of Toronto over ten years through the Development Charge Reduction Program, funded through the Canada-Ontario Partnership to Build. This landmark funding deal will pay for major infrastructure projects in the City’s 10 Year Capital Plan, including our road network, water infrastructure, and enhanced transit capacity to support a growing population, instead of through development charges collected from residential homebuyers. Through the Provincial and Federal funding, the City can now reduce its residential development charges by 40 to 60 per cent for the next three years. These reductions will apply across the board for residential development. Deeper development charge discounts (60 per cent) will be offered to units two or more bedrooms, to help incentivize building more housing for families. In a time when our housing market has slowed down, these development charge reductions will help make projects more financially viable, build more of the kind of housing we need, and make homes more affordable for residents. This program will not only catalyze building more ho…
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:12 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Adoption of balance of the item as amended
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:10 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Adoption of Recommendations 1 to 3 only
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:09 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Chow - motion 3
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:08 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Colle - motion 2
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:06 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Holyday - motion 1d
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:04 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Holyday - motion 1c
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:03 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Holyday - motion 1b
City Council · 2026-06-24 18:02 PM
Majority required - MM42.44 - Holyday - motion 1a
This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 12-storey (47 metres, including the Mechanical Penthouse) residential building with approximately 172 dwelling units, including four live/work units on the ground floor. Amendments to the Official Plan include redesignating the subject lands from Neighbourhoods to Apartment Neighbourhoods and deleting Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) 365. The application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan.
City Council · 2026-06-24 16:44 PM
Majority required - EY32.1 - Adopt the item as amended
This report recommends that City Council refuse the alteration to the designated heritage property at 9 Drumsnab Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act. The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to remove the existing original windows and to enlarge certain features of the entryway assembly, including the sidelights, transom window, and door opening. These alterations do not comply with the South Rosedale HCD Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.
City Council · 2026-06-24 10:28 AM
Majority required - TE31.24 - Saxe - motion 1
On July 10, 2025, an application to amend the Zoning By-law was submitted (the "Application") and deemed complete on November 6, 2025, satisfying the City's minimum application requirements. The Application seeks to permit three four-storey residential buildings with approximately 125 dwelling units at 3100 Weston Road. The Carmine Stefano Community Centre and existing heritage structures, including the main house, garage and pumphouse on the subject lands are to remain. On February 23, 2026, the applicant appealed the Application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act. This Report recommends that the City Solicitor, with the appropriate City Staff, attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues.
Etobicoke York Community Council · 2026-05-26
Majority required
Etobicoke York Community Council · 2026-05-26
Majority required
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Etobicoke York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. This report responds to an application submitted by the property owner of 4 Berryton Avenue, requesting approval for a site-specific Fence Exemption under Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 - 1.3C.(3) Fences, for a proposed pool fence located at 4 Berryton Avenue within the Etobicoke York District. The purpose of this report is to advise Council concerning an application by the property owner of 4 Berryton Avenue for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-1.3.C.(3) of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences. The property owner is seeking Council's permission to allow for a Juliette-style gate, which does not comply with the standards stipulated by Section 447 - 1.3C.(3) of the by-law. The property owner is seeking relief from the by-law regulations to be able to use a Juliette-style enclosure and gate to prevent access into the pool area. If the owner was to erect a 4th fence between the pool and the deck, there will be limited access to move in that area. The proposed fence does not create a sightline obstruc…
Etobicoke York Community Council · 2026-05-26
Majority required