City Council · 2026-04-23 16:41 PM
Adopt Item as Amended
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 14 only
- Motion result
- Carried
- Recorded tally
- 25-0
- Source outcome
Toronto council record
Motion-level votes, outcomes, decision bodies, official item details, and ways to participate—connected to the current elected-official record, not to any candidate campaign.
913
Agenda items with votes
0
Listed committees
153
Pages of sourced history
Council accountability
Page 19 of 153
Toronto council records are cached and may be delayed while updates load. A missing record does not establish how an official voted.
The Provincial Government has introduced legislation to take City of Toronto land on Toronto Island and at Bathurst and Queen’s Quay. At the March Council Meeting, City Council overwhelmingly voted to oppose any unilateral expropriation of City land by the Government of Ontario. Further, we voted to include Toronto residents and their democratically elected municipal government in all significant decisions impacting Toronto, including decisions about the uses and future of the Toronto waterfront. Through their legislation today, the Government of Ontario has chosen to ignore the decisions of Toronto’s government. Worse, the Provincial Government is going to take parkland and pave it at Little Norway Park, in a neighbourhood that needs more precious green space and public space, not less. We need to send a clear message to the Provincial Government that this is not acceptable to us as a municipal government. Nor is it acceptable to the residents of waterfront neighbourhoods, or any resident of Toronto, as they learn there is nothing stopping the Provincial Government from taking parks, roads, public spaces or anything they decide they want. To date, no one has seen conc…
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:41 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 14 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:40 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 13 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:39 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 12 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:38 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 11 only - Revote
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:37 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 11 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:36 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 10 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:35 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 9 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:33 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 8 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:32 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 7 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:31 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 6 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:30 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 5 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:29 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 4 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:28 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 3 only - Revote
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:26 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 3 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:25 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 2 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:24 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Adoption of Recommendation 1 only
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:22 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Colle - motion 3
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:20 PM
Majority required - MM40.46 - Matlow - motion 1
At its meeting on March 25 and 26, 2026, City Council requested the City Solicitor to report to its April 22, 23 and 24, 2026 meeting on potential legal options to defend the City of Toronto’s interests, including property ownership, in the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport lands and other important City-owned Waterfront lands. Confidential Attachment 1 provides further information and advice regarding potential legal options.
City Council · 2026-04-23 16:19 PM
Majority required - CC40.4 - Adopt the item
Barbara Hall Park is a critical urban green space in the Church-Wellesley Village, home to two memorials of profound importance: the AIDS Memorial and the Trans Memorial. The park has experienced persistent health and safety concerns, significantly intensified by the COVID-19 pandemic and a rise in opioid-related incidents. These issues, particularly pronounced during overnight hours, include vandalism, violence and lateral violence, and maintenance challenges – especially around the Memorials which are in secluded areas in the park. These memorials are central to the 2SLGBTQ+ community and are located in sections of the park that make them particularly vulnerable to damage and misuse. In response to ongoing issues, the City of Toronto established the Barbara Hall Park Response Team, comprised of municipal staff, local agencies, and community partners, to pursue sustainable solutions. This work aligns with the Downtown East Action Plan (adopted July 24, 2024, 2024.EC14.8), which emphasizes the need to balance public safety with support for community members and businesses. Current mitigation measures include: a. Routine Maintenance: is serviced for litter and maintenance thr…
City Council · 2026-04-23 14:35 PM
Two-Thirds required - MM40.25 - Waive the referral - Revote
City Council · 2026-04-23 14:34 PM
Two-Thirds required - MM40.25 - Waive the referral
Work on the Yonge North Subway Extension is now underway, with key design and alignment decisions actively advancing. At the same time, the City of Toronto is progressing the North York Centre Secondary Plan (Phase 3), which contemplates the addition of 100,000 new residents in the area. This growth builds on the significant intensification already planned under the Yonge North Secondary Plan. Together, these plans confirm that the Yonge Street corridor between Finch and Steeles is one of the most rapidly intensifying urban areas in the Greater Toronto Area. This motion is informed by previous City of Toronto staff analysis and Council direction, including the December 2023 “ Cummer Station – Supplemental Report ” (Background File 241560), which assessed the inclusion of Cummer Station within the Yonge North Subway Extension and confirmed the technical and planning implications of the current alignment. The current alignment of the Yonge North Subway Extension excludes a station at Cummer Avenue. This omission results in a notably long station spacing of approximately 2 km between Finch and Steeles, which is atypical for a high-density urban context and inconsist…
City Council · 2026-04-23 14:31 PM
Two-Thirds required - MM40.22 - Waive the referral
In light of sustained population growth, increasing development pressure, and rising demand on Toronto’s transit system, there is an opportunity to rethink how transit infrastructure is designed and integrated into the city. Major projects such as the Yonge North Subway Extension and the Scarborough Subway Extension present a rare chance to move beyond a narrow focus on transportation function toward a more holistic approach to station planning. Historically, many subway stations in Toronto have been designed primarily for mobility, often with limited amenities such as public washrooms, minimal architectural ambition, and weak integration with surrounding communities. As the city evolves, there is growing recognition that stations can function as civic hubs that support not only transit use, but also safety, accessibility, economic activity, housing, and community life. Global transit systems, including those in Taipei, demonstrate how stations can be designed as open-concept, well-lit, and highly visible environments, often incorporating two-storey configurations, platform screen doors, and stations that are integrated into buildings rather than stand alone structures. Thei…
City Council · 2026-04-23 14:29 PM
Two-Thirds required - MM40.19 - Waive the referral
As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Grand Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required. Transportation Services has reviewed the need for pedestrian crossing protection at Grand Avenue and Algoma Street. Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services does not recommend the installation of pedestrian crossing protection at Grand Avenue and Algoma Street as the warrant criteria was not met for either a pedestrian crossover (PXO) or traffic control signals.
City Council · 2026-04-23 14:14 PM
Majority required - EY30.11 - Adopt the item