City Council · 2025-05-22 17:13 PM
Adopt Item
Majority required - MM30.40 - Adopt the item
- Motion result
- Carried
- Recorded tally
- 19-1
- Source outcome
- Carried, 19-1
Toronto council record
Motion-level votes, outcomes, decision bodies, official item details, and ways to participate—connected to the current elected-official record, not to any candidate campaign.
906
Agenda items with votes
0
Listed committees
151
Pages of sourced history
Council accountability
Page 52 of 151
Toronto council records are cached and may be delayed while updates load. A missing record does not establish how an official voted.
On April 15, 2025 the Committee of Adjustment refused Applications B0061/24TEY, A0869/24TEY, and A0870/24TEY brought by the owner of 11 Oswald Crescent for a consent to sever and two applications for minor variances. The applicant seeks to demolish the existing residential dwelling, sever the subject property into two lots, and build two new detached dwellings. Copies of the Committee's decisions are attached. The Applications require variances to City-wide Zoning By-law Number 569-2013, including but not limited to: minimum required lot area, minimum required lot frontage, maximum permitted height of side exterior main walls, and maximum permitted driveway width. This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor requires instructions to obtain party status in the appeal and subsequently attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing which can be scheduled at any time.
City Council · 2025-05-22 17:13 PM
Majority required - MM30.40 - Adopt the item
This motion will give the City Solicitor the authority to appeal the Committee of Adjustment’s decision approving the minor variance application at 114 Restever Gate (Application A0130/25EYK); to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to oppose the development in the Application; to retain outside consultants as necessary; and to negotiate a resolution of the appeal. On March 5, 2025, the Applicant applied to the Committee for variances to the City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013. The Application sought approval to construct a new detached fourplex, requesting a height of 10.33m with a parking space located in the front yard and a platform that encroaches 3.22m into the required rear yard setback. In a report from Tree Protection and Plan Review staff dated April 9, 2025, Environment, Climate and Forestry staff recommended refusal of the Application (the Staff Report is attached as Attachment 1). Environment, Climate and Forestry staff noted that approval of the requested variances may result in construction that requires the removal of healthy by-law protected trees. On May 1, 2025, the Etobicoke York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application, subject…
City Council · 2025-05-22 17:11 PM
Majority required - MM30.39 - Adopt the item
Through the processing of development applications, the City's development review service shapes how the city grows and delivers services necessary to successfully promote and manage growth. This service is critical in maintaining Toronto's position as a world-class city by supporting the delivery of new housing supply; transit projects; healthcare facilities; innovation, manufacturing and industrial facilities; landmark projects; and critical infrastructure that support our social and economic prosperity, growth and cohesion. The City of Toronto's development review service continues to navigate significant legislative change as well as market and geopolitical uncertainty. To address resultant changes in development and application processing trends, the City is focused on transforming its organizational structure and processes, with the goal of expediting the review of all development projects, especially those that deliver new affordable and purpose-built rental homes and support economic growth and job creation. Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C, Schedule 13 sets out the City's fees for processing development applications. Fees are intended to recover th…
City Council · 2025-05-22 17:05 PM
Majority required - PH21.3 - Adopt the item
In December 2024, City Council directed the City Manager in consultation with the City Solicitor, applicable City divisions, the Toronto Police Service and other applicable stakeholders, to report to City Council in the first quarter of 2025, informed by public consultations and a constitutional legal expert opinion on the Charter Rights implications from the City Solicitor, with a proposed bylaw, with an emphasis on protecting vulnerable institutions such as places of worship, faith-based schools and cultural institutions, that supports the City's commitment to keeping Torontonians safe from hate and protects Charter rights that address impacts of demonstrations that target people based on their identity as prohibited under the Ontario Human Rights Code. Since that time, staff have been advancing work on a proposed bylaw in response to Council direction. The City Manager's Office and Legal Services worked closely together, in consultation with the Toronto Police Service, and informed by feedback from City divisions with applicable subject-matter expertise, such as Corporate Real Estate Management (Corporate Security), Municipal Licensing and Standards, Social Development, Strateg…
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:50 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Adopt the item as amended
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:49 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Ainslie - motion 7
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:48 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Perks - motion 5
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:47 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4b
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:46 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4j
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:45 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4i
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:44 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4h
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:44 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4g
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:43 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4f
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:42 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Matlow - motion 6d
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:41 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4e
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:40 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Matlow - motion 6c
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:39 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Matlow - motion 6b
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:39 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4d
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:38 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4c
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:37 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Chernos Lin - motion 4a
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:36 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Matlow - motion 6a
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:34 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Pasternak - motion 1b
City Council · 2025-05-22 16:33 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Pasternak - motion 1a
City Council · 2025-05-22 12:11 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Moise - motion 2
City Council · 2025-05-22 12:10 PM
Majority required - CC30.5 - Matlow - motion 3
The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment requesting variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 relating to rear porch side yard setback, side yard setback for the rear canopy, platforms at or above the second story of a detached house, side yard setback of a platform, side yard setback, building depth, height of side exterior main walls facing a side lot line, side yard setback and maximum height for an ancillary building containing a laneway suite and soft landscaping in order to construct a new dwelling and a laneway suite in the rear yard at 521 Davisville Avenue (Application A0560/23NY). Urban Forestry and Community Planning provided reports to the Committee of Adjustment recommending the imposition of conditions in the event the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application. Community Planning staff also recommended modifications be made to the application that were agreed upon by the applicant. On February 20, 2025, the North York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application. A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached as Attachment 1. The applicant has appealed the refusal to the Toronto Local Appe…
City Council · 2025-05-22 14:41 PM
Majority required - MM30.33 - Adopt the item
In recognition of Louis March’s decades-long commitment to public safety, equity and youth development, the City of Toronto should rename Shuter-Sumach Parkette to Louis March Park. Regent Park was one of the neighborhoods where Louis did some of his most impactful work, and would recognize his deep commitment to ending gun violence and supporting the most vulnerable communities in Toronto. Louis March founded the Zero Gun Violence Movement, believing that everyone deserved to live in a safe, supportive and opportunity-rich environment regardless of their postal code. His sudden passing on July 20, 2024, was a profound loss for the city, but his vision continues to guide efforts towards peace and justice. For decades, Louis March worked with community groups, mothers who had lost children to violence, youth leaders and elected officials to address the root causes of violence in Toronto. His tireless advocacy called for meaningful investments in preventative solutions and youth empowerment - focusing on education, mental health, employment and restorative justice. He was particularly vocal in challenging systemic issues that fuel violence and limit opportunity in historically…
City Council · 2025-05-22 14:33 PM
Majority required - MM30.20 - Adopt the item